Should urban square be empty, without trees and disappointing like this ?
After a After a week of watching Tianjin Central Cultural Square, I found that it is empty during daytime as the photo shows, except it has few people who go through to another exit from the Sqaure. The centre of the square has a big fountain here, but it does not work now. In fact, it is clear that a fountain like this is impossible to work properly everyday to attract people. Also, it needs a lot of electricity to make it work. So, it has been stopped becasue of the cost and because and the square is normally empty. Here is a question: why it should have been designed as an empty space?
Then, please have a look at the photo below, which is an aerial view of the first master plan in 1922 for this space. It was called ‘France Park’ ) and it was designed and built by the French Bureau. The circle in the centre of the re-designed square is just the old plan for the design of the above empty square before which is not at all designed without trees or place for people to play. Here is another question: why were the big trees were removed? Wikipedia gives a short definition for square: A square (geometry) is a polygon with four equal sides and angles. It did not say anything that the square should be desgined without any trees or that it should be empty!

Where are the answers?!


















