We are aware that there is a great prejudice in favour of Gothic buildings of every description, from the cottage to the palace; arising from the associations of reverence, antiquity, and chivalry, which are connected with them. Maturely considered, however, we cannot help sometimes doubting whether the existing prejudice in favour of Gothic architecture does not reflect more discredit than honour on human nature; at all events, it is a prejudice unworthy of an age of rapid improvement like the present. We freely acknowledge that we do not expect many converts to our views in this respect; because simplicity is one of the last refinements, not only in the progress of the arts, but in the progress of opinion. Believing, as we do, that this principle is undeniable, we have little doubt but that much of what is now considered beauty, both in art and in literature, will by the next generation be neglected, and, as the French characteristically express it, "reduit au merite historique." However, as a superabundance of wealth must find means of displaying itself, let there be Gothic or other fanciful cottages and lodges; but let not fancy be exercised on them at the expense of the health and comfort of the inhabitants. Let architects and their employers begin by such dimensions and arrangements as will insure commodiousness, and every requisite convenience; let there be lofty ceilings for a large volume of air; large windows for abundance of light, and for ample ventilation; a raised floor, and thick walls, to insure dryness and warmth; and fireplaces, flues and chimneys always placed in the interior walls, and never in the outside ones.* Having fixed these points, superadding sound foundations, materials, and workmanship, there can be no objection to the exercise of such taste, or no taste, as the parties may possess. A little of the absurd, indeed, sometimes does more for general improvement than the good, because it calls forth, criticism.
