|
The site of Horace's farm in the Sabine
Hills |
|
The Temple of Vesta at Tivoli inspired
many tourists to
build temples in English gardens. |
The progress of garden design towards an empiricist conception
of nature was delayed by the overwhelming influence of the Italian
countryside. We do not know for certain how the Italian influence
arrived in England but we do know why. Designers looked to Italy
because of their belief that art should imitate nature, and that
nature meant universals or essences. One way of discovering whether
something was a universal was to check whether it had been accepted
by mankind for a long period of time.
Return to section
heading
Poets imitated themes and verse forms from Horace and Virgil. Thinkers went back to the
writings of Greek and Roman philosophers. Painters copied antique
models: 'Thus the best artists', Shaftesbury tells us, 'are said to have
been indefatigible in studying the best statues: as esteeming them
a better rule than the perfectest human bodies could afford'.
Nothing was more natural than for garden designers to try and
discover what the landscape of antiquity had actually looked
like.
There were five main ways in which their opinions were formed:
by making a grand tour to see Roman remains, like the Temple of Vesta at Tivoli; by purchasing
Italian landscape paintings (Shaftesbury is known to have admired
Claude); by reading accounts of the
villas of the ancients, such as Robert Castell's; by copying the settings of
Italian buildings, as was done for the Temple of Four Winds at
Castle Howard; and by transposing the
techniques of Italian stage design to garden design.
Return to
section heading
Which of these five
sources of influence was the most important? In my opinion the
answer is landscape painting. The objectives of garden design have
been traced to Greek and Roman philosophy with the poetry of
Virgil and Horace as the most immediate source. It must
have appeared a logical move to look to painting, as poetry's
sister art, to discover what the landscape of antiquity actually
looked like. Aristotle, whose
Poetics was the standard seventeenth century text on the
imitation of nature, had made a direct comparison of the two arts.
Dryden discusses the Poetics
at length in his preface to Du
Fresnoy's The art of painting, and both Claude and Poussin turned instinctively to the Roman
poets for themes. Their canvasses, illustrating scenes from Virgil
and Ovid, filled with remnants of
classical architecture and animated by figures in Roman dress,
appeared to show a universal ideal of beauty which had been valued
since the classical age. At a time when Oxford undergraduates could
be fined for challenging the authority of Aristotle it was natural
that designers should look to poetry's sister art to provide an
ideal vision of nature to imitate.
In 1697 Dryden had recently translated Virgil's works into English
and if we compare an illustration from his translation with an
illustration from a contemporary manual on painting, we can see how
closely the visions of antiquity given by poets and painters
resemble each other. Happy husbandsmen merrily cultivate the fields
in Dryden's illustrations. If they look more wooden than happy it
is because they were drawn from antique models instead of from
life. It is interesting to note that one of the the illustration's
to Dryden's Virgil was subscribed by
'George London of his Majesties
Royall Garden in St St James's Park'.
George London became the most famous garden designer of his
day.
|
.An illustration from Dryden's translation of
Virgil, 1697. This plate was subscribed by the best known English
garden designer of the period, George London. If the husbandsmen
look more wooden than happy it is because they were drawn from
antique models instead of from life. |
Return to section
heading
Claude and Poussin were seen to be illustrating the
same rural retirement theme which the poets celebrated. Sir Kenneth
Clark has described their paintings
as a representation of 'the most enchanting dream which has ever
consoled mankind, the myth of a Golden Age in which man lived on
the fruits of the earth, peacefully, piously, and with primitive
simplicity'. It was an enchanating dream of an 'earthly
paradise.....a harmony between man and nature'. A seventeenth
century gardening author's version of this dream is shown on the
frontispiece of Timothy Nourse's
Campania Felix. Nourse had been a bursar at Oxford but lost
his job after being converted to Roman Catholicism. He suffered
during the Popish Plot and died in 1699, the same year as Sir
William Temple. Like many of their contemporaries, Nourse and
Temple came to believe that rural retirement offered the chance of
a better life. The frontispiece of Nourse's book shows a toga-clad
Happy Husbandsman ploughing his furrow towards a representative
seventeenth century garden.
We can conclude our discussion of aesthetic theory by saying
that when he reached the garden he began its transformation into an
eighteenth century English landscape.
|