<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>context insensitive design &#8211; Garden Design and Landscape Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/tag/context-insensitive-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog</link>
	<description>Gardenvisit.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:20:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Barking Town Square does not deserve a public open space award</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/barking-town-square-does-not-deserve-a-public-open-space-award/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/barking-town-square-does-not-deserve-a-public-open-space-award/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[context-sensitive design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landscape Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London urban design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[context insensitive design]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=304</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;d never been to Barking. But in 2008 Barking Town Square won the the 5th European Prize for Urban Public Space so I went to have a look. Sorry about the weak pun, but the judges are Barking Mad. The main building has a sentimental Bauhaus-ey charm but the urban space is a plain rectangle [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/barking_town_square_muf_architects.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-308 alignright" title="barking_town_square_muf_architects" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/barking_town_square_muf_architects-200x300.jpg" alt="Barking Town Square by Muf Architecture Art should not have won the 5th European Prize for Urban Public Space, however good the architecture" width="200" height="300" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/barking_town_square_muf_architects-200x300.jpg 200w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/barking_town_square_muf_architects.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;d never been to Barking. But in 2008 Barking Town Square won the the 5th <a href="http://urban.cccb.org/prize/">European Prize for Urban Public Space</a> so I went to have a look. Sorry about the weak pun, but the judges are Barking Mad. The main building has a sentimental <a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/garden/bauhaus">Bauhaus</a>-ey charm but the urban space is a plain rectangle of pink Spanish granite, laid in stretcher bond for no good reason. The hoardings illustrate some planting to come but the &#8220;Public Open Space&#8221; is a void, an empty space, a nothing. The judges all represent organizations which promote the art of architecture, which is fair enough, because the building is OK, but this is <em>NOT </em>a good  urban square.  It is as though Jane Jacobs and William H Whyte had never lived. There is no mixed use: the adjoining buildings are all municipal, without the shops and cafes which might have provided users. There is nowhere to sit, ignoring wisdom of Jan Ghel. The &#8216;square&#8217; is almost a cul-de-sac, ignoring Ed Bacon and Bill Hillier. The paving is non-<a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/garden_products/water/irrigation_systems_equipment">SUDS</a>. The only redeeming feature is a piece of public art described as a &#8220;7 metre high folly [which] recreates a fragment of the imaginary lost past of Barking&#8221;. But why re-create an imaginary lost past? Barking had a medieval abbey. Captain Cook was married in a Barking church. Then there is the cultural context. Barking has one of the largest immigrant communities in London, with  many from the Punjab and Sub-Saharan Africa &#8211; neither of which region is known to admire the Bauhaus. Some architects show genius in urban design. <a href="http://www.muf.co.uk/">Muf</a> muffed it.</p>
<p><em>Note</em>: The photograph was taken at about 11.30 am on an unseasonably warm autumn day (28th September 2008). The good urban spaces in London were overflowing with people. The places which remind one of pre-1989 East Berlin were empty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/barking-town-square-does-not-deserve-a-public-open-space-award/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.gardenvisit.com @ 2026-06-09 04:26:07 by W3 Total Cache
-->