https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/landscape-and-garden-interpretation/ Gardenvisit.com Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:30:44 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8 https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/landscape-and-garden-interpretation/#comment-636 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:30:44 +0000 http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=772#comment-636 Very interesting question.

]]> https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/landscape-and-garden-interpretation/#comment-635 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:46:19 +0000 http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=772#comment-635 (1) I think it was Weisman I heard say on the radio that ‘all species become extinct’
(2) I drilled into a 700 million year old mudstone yesterday and, looking at the mud dust, thought that I was putting it back to how it used to be
(3) Think about 1 tree in a hectare of grassland. If it was planted by man it is completely different to a self-sown tree, even if they are physically idendical: so I believe the audience/conductor DOES matter

]]> https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/landscape-and-garden-interpretation/#comment-634 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:29:04 +0000 http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=772#comment-634 This relates to your previous feed on Landscape as art or music. The need for interpretation begs the question as to the need for an audience too. I like Alan Weisman’s image ‘The World Without Us’ – suggesting that the at many levels the landscape has no need of audience or conductor.

]]> https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/landscape-and-garden-interpretation/#comment-633 Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:46:55 +0000 http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=772#comment-633 Interesting question.

]]>