<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Historic garden restoration &#8211; Garden Design and Landscape Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/category/historic-garden-restoration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog</link>
	<description>Gardenvisit.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 15:21:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Wrest Park Garden is a stylistic hybrid &#8211; and all the better for it</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wrest-park-garden-is-a-stylistic-hybrid-and-all-the-better-for-it/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wrest-park-garden-is-a-stylistic-hybrid-and-all-the-better-for-it/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2017 18:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[English Gardens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Gardens to Visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic garden restoration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=11063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wrest Park is not as well-visited as it deserves. The garden was restored in 2011 and, faced with the question &#8216;when should it be restored to?&#8217;, English Heritage took the sensible decision to restore separate parts of the garden to different dates: the Baroque section to the Late Baroque period, the perimeter canal section to [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_11065" style="width: 1035px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/wrest_park_baroque_style.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-11065" class="wp-image-11065 size-full" src="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/wrest_park_baroque_style.jpg" alt="" width="1025" height="309" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/wrest_park_baroque_style.jpg 1025w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/wrest_park_baroque_style-300x90.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/wrest_park_baroque_style-768x232.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/wrest_park_baroque_style-624x188.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 1025px) 100vw, 1025px" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-11065" class="wp-caption-text">The central axis of Wrest Park Garden is one of the best examples of the High Baroque Style of garden design in England</p></div>
<p>Wrest Park is not as well-visited as it deserves. The garden was restored in 2011 and, faced with the question &#8216;when should it be restored to?&#8217;, English Heritage took the sensible decision to restore separate parts of the garden to different dates: the Baroque section to the <a href="https://www.gardenvisit.com/history_theory/garden_landscape_design_articles/historic_design_styles/high_baroque_garden_design_style">Late Baroque period</a>, the perimeter canal section to <a href="https://www.gardenvisit.com/history_theory/garden_landscape_design_articles/historic_design_styles/serpentine_garden_design_style">the Serpentine Style </a>of the  mid-eighteenth century, the Victorian section to the <a href="https://www.gardenvisit.com/history_theory/garden_landscape_design_articles/historic_design_styles/mixed_garden_design_style">Mixed Style</a> of the mid-nineteenth century.  Visitors may well find it necessary to consult the Gardenvisit.com style chart to understand the design. I <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/tim-richardson/8565767/The-restoration-of-Wrest-Park-Bedfordshire.html">agree with Tim Richardson</a> that Wrest Park may appear in a future stylistic classification as a prime example of a &#8216;National Trust restoration&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wrest-park-garden-is-a-stylistic-hybrid-and-all-the-better-for-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michelham Priory Medieval Garden</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/michelham-priory-medieval-garden/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/michelham-priory-medieval-garden/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Garden Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garden history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic garden restoration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=10910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Michelham Priory Garden is a delightfully tranquil moated manor house in East Sussex. What I like most about it is the recreated medieval garden. And what I like most about the medieval garden is the &#8216;flowery mead&#8217; and the turf seats. Our knowledge of Michelham &#8211; and of medieval gardens in general &#8211; is not [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7AHDMkuMDts" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe> <a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/gardens/michelham_priory_garden">Michelham Priory Garden</a> is a delightfully tranquil moated manor house in East Sussex. What I like most about it is the recreated medieval garden. And what I like most about the medieval garden is the &#8216;flowery mead&#8217; and the turf seats. Our knowledge of Michelham &#8211; and of medieval gardens in general &#8211; is not enough to say whether or not the details are accurate. But, to me, these details feel right and this is not a feeling I have about comparable recreations, either by the Garden History Museum or National Trust. Nor do I have this feeling about cathedral cloister garths. They are all managed with lawn mowers and this device was invented in 1830. The usual problem with medieval recreations is that their designers are muddled about the differences between medieval, renaissance and baroque gardens. So they use clipped hedges, which were a baroque feature, to make renaissance-style knot gardens. It does not make sense!</p>
<div id="attachment_10911" style="width: 1010px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/michelham_priory_medieval_gardens.jpg"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-10911" class="size-full wp-image-10911" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/michelham_priory_medieval_gardens.jpg" alt="Michelham Priory Medieval Garden" width="1000" height="562" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/michelham_priory_medieval_gardens.jpg 1000w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/michelham_priory_medieval_gardens-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/michelham_priory_medieval_gardens-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/michelham_priory_medieval_gardens-624x351.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-10911" class="wp-caption-text">The &#8216;flowery mead&#8217; in Michelham Priory Medieval Garden</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/michelham-priory-medieval-garden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shalimar Bagh Kashmir: historic garden conservation</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/shalimar-bagh-kashmir-historic-garden-conservation/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/shalimar-bagh-kashmir-historic-garden-conservation/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asian gardens and landscapes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garden history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garden travel and tours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic garden restoration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=8930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a generalisation, the condition of historic gardens in most countries is getting better. They enjoy more expert attention, more visitors and more resources. Shalimar Bagh in Kashmir is an exception. When I saw it in 2006, it did not seem to be in quite as good condition as when Susan Jellicoe (black and white [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh.jpg" alt="" title="shalimar_bagh" width="775" height="567" class="alignright size-full wp-image-8931" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh-300x219.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh-768x562.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh-624x457.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh_kashmir_DSCF4262.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh_kashmir_DSCF4262.jpg" alt="" title="shalimar_bagh_kashmir_DSCF4262" width="775" height="513" class="alignright size-full wp-image-8932" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh_kashmir_DSCF4262.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh_kashmir_DSCF4262-300x199.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh_kashmir_DSCF4262-768x508.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh_kashmir_DSCF4262-624x413.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a><br />
As a generalisation, the condition of historic gardens in most countries is getting better. They enjoy more expert attention, more visitors and more resources.  Shalimar Bagh in Kashmir is an exception.  When I saw it in 2006, it did not seem to be in quite as good condition as when Susan Jellicoe (black and white photo above) photographed it c1970. And when I saw it again in 2012 (colour photo, above) it seemed in even worse condition. Oddly, there were also far more visitors than in 2006. Does anyone know what the problem is? Lack of money? Lack of will? A concern for the bugs which enjoy rotting timber? A lack of concern for India&#8217;s Islamic heritage?<br />
<a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh_historic_garden.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh_historic_garden.jpg" alt="" title="shalimar_bagh_historic_garden" width="775" height="516" class="alignright size-full wp-image-8937" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh_historic_garden.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh_historic_garden-300x200.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh_historic_garden-768x511.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/shalimar_bagh_historic_garden-624x415.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/shalimar-bagh-kashmir-historic-garden-conservation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Landscapes</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/political-landscapes/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/political-landscapes/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Garden Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garden history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic garden restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landscape Architecture]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=8812</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[st]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-all.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-all.jpg" alt="" width="775" height="1559" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8813" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-all.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-all-149x300.jpg 149w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-all-509x1024.jpg 509w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-all-768x1545.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-all-764x1536.jpg 764w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-all-624x1255.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a><br />
<div id="attachment_8814" style="width: 785px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-under.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-8814" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-under.jpg" alt="" width="775" height="2148" class="size-full wp-image-8814" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-under.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-under-108x300.jpg 108w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-under-369x1024.jpg 369w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-under-768x2129.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-under-554x1536.jpg 554w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-under-739x2048.jpg 739w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/treptower-park-under-624x1729.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-8814" class="wp-caption-text">Soviet Memorial, Treptower Park</p></div></p>
<p>Located in East Berlin, the Soviet Memorial in Treptower Park is the last resting place for 7,000 Russian soldiers. Planned in 1945, finished in 1949, the design was chosen in a competition to which 33 submissions were recorded. The winning design came from an artist&#8217;s collective that included the architect Yakov Belopolski, the sculpter Yevgeni Vuchetic, the painter Alexander Gorpenko and the engineer Sarra Valerius.The memorial was completely restored between 2003 and 2009, including the shipping of the 70 ton, 12 metre tall main statue &#8211; a Red Army soldier holding a child and standing over a shattered swastika &#8211; to the island of Rügen and back for repair. The memorial is ca. 570 metres long, 150 metres wide, and the main statue with its base mound stands 30 metres tall.</p>
<p>I am always very impressed with designs that rest heavily on trees for their main spatial definition. The Soviet Memorial relies on plane trees &#8211; now around 30 metres high &#8211; to define its outer boundary, with pleached limes &#8211; now around 15 metres high &#8211; used to step this scale down as an internal edge. There is an amazing avenue of weeping birches, now with crown diameters of up to 15 metres, planted at 25 metre centres. The western end of the axis is closed with lombardy poplars. One would look far today for a client that would be prepared to countenance a design that would first be &#8216;realised&#8217; 40 years and more after its actual completion. As the point of the memorial is to convey everlasting glory upon the fallen soldiers, this aspect of the design makes it for me particularly moving.</p>
<p>The detailing of the memorial is superb. Students of landscape design should be encouraged to visit it to learn the importance of step, edge and paving details, and the enormous power of simplicity when &#8216;writ large&#8217;. It is a living memorial, fresh red carnations are strewn throughout on the statuary, and the room below the main statue is filled with flowers and garlands. There is a complete absence of religious symbolism.</p>
<p>Many people will not like this memorial, or this kind of political landscape. I was surprised myself that I found it very moving. Though most visitors were simply out enjoying the sun, one overheard many conversations on political themes, so it does seem that this piece of landscape design is still engendering debate.</p>
<p>The final image, included for contrast and to encourage comment, is taken in Budapest&#8217;s Memento Park, a collection of statuary from the Russian occupation of Hungary. The statue is of Stalin&#8217;s boots, all that remains of a massive sculpture of him that once stood in the centre of the city, after the population sawed off the rest of it and pulled it down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/political-landscapes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Greenwich Park have the oldest avenue of trees in England?</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/does-greenwich-park-have-the-oldest-avenue-of-trees-in-england/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/does-greenwich-park-have-the-oldest-avenue-of-trees-in-england/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Garden Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garden history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic garden restoration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=7376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The candidates for &#8216;oldest avenue of trees in England&#8217; include: The yew trees in Westbourne said to have been planted in 1544. The Bucklebury Oaks, also known as The Queens&#8217; Avenues, which may have been planted to commemorate a visit by Queen Elizabeth I as well as a later visit by Queen Anne Joris Hoefnagel&#8217;s [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_8224" style="width: 785px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/greenwich_park_historic_oldest_avenue2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-8224" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/greenwich_park_historic_oldest_avenue2.jpg" alt="" title="greenwich_park_historic_oldest_avenue2" width="775" height="180" class="size-full wp-image-8224" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/greenwich_park_historic_oldest_avenue2.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/greenwich_park_historic_oldest_avenue2-300x70.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/greenwich_park_historic_oldest_avenue2-768x178.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/greenwich_park_historic_oldest_avenue2-624x145.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-8224" class="wp-caption-text">The most important avenue in Greenwich Park, because it is grass, not tarmac, and because it has so many ancient chestnuts, is blocked by a Royal Bin Store for the cafe (above left - also note the design of the picnic tables, and sigh). When the bin store is removed the view on the right will be revealed.  Queen Elizabeth I was born in 1533 in the palace of Placentia, in Greenwich, and learned to ride a horse in the park (not in this avenue, which was not planted until 1660-1, possibly on the recommendation of John Evelyn).</p></div>
<p>The candidates for &#8216;oldest avenue of trees in England&#8217; include:</p>
<ul>
<li> The yew trees in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westbourne,_West_Sussex">Westbourne </a>said to have been planted in 1544.</li>
<li> The Bucklebury Oaks, also known as The Queens&#8217; Avenues, which may have been planted to commemorate a visit by Queen Elizabeth I as well as a later visit by Queen Anne</li>
<li> Joris Hoefnagel&#8217;s drawing of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nonsuch.JPG">Nonsuch Palace</a> makes it look as though a line of trees leads to the entrance and there was a similar feature is shown on reconstructions of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palace_of_Beaulieu">Palace of Beaulieu</a></li>
</ul>
<p>But the &#8216;correct&#8217; answer depends in the interpretation of the question:</p>
<ul>
<li> the processional route at Stonehenge is often described as an avenue and probably passed through trees for some or all of its length. Other stone circles (eg Callanish) also had what are assumed to be processional routes, as did Egyptian and Mesopotamian temples</li>
<li> the word &#8216;avenue&#8217; (from the French <em>avenir</em>) was not used in English until the mid-seventeenth century. A similar feature made before this date would probably have been called an alley (from the French <em>aller</em>)</li>
</ul>
<p>So on a strict interpretation of the word &#8216;avenue&#8217;, the oldest avenue in England may be in Greenwich Park. The chestnut trees, which survive, were planted c1660 and John Evelyn, who is recorded in the OED as the first English author to use the word &#8216;avenue&#8217;, may have advised on the layout. He had an avenue, which does not survive, in his nearby garden (at Sayes Court in Deptford). The best-looking avenue of old trees in Greenwich Park runs north from a point near the intersection of the Great Cross Avenue with Blackheath Avenue. The view along this avenue was blocked a few years ago by the erection of a &#8216;hit-and-miss&#8217; fence round an outdoor rubbish dump for the park cafe. It makes one think that the Royal Parks, who manage Greenwich, either have no knowledge of garden history or no interest in garden history. So one does not know whether to conclude &#8216;forgive them, Oh Lord, for they know not what they do&#8217; or whether to conclude &#8216;forgive them, Oh Lord, for they know exactly what they do&#8217;. But I regard the positioning of this rubbish dump as unforgivable. When an airplane crashes, an accident investigation team is established. There is a need for a similar investigation of the <a href="http://www.royalparks.gov.uk/">Royal Parks Agency</a>. The Commission of Enquiry should have plenipotentary powers to call for papers, to summon witnesses, to take evidence under oath and to make binding recommendations, if necessary for the future involvement of expert garden historians and landscape architects in decision making for the Royal Parks. How many managers of Royal Parks have qualifications in garden history? Are there <em>any </em>qualified garden historians on the agency&#8217;s payroll? Several excellent landscape architecture firms have given advice on Greenwich Park but, so far as I know, no trained designers or historians have had a role in the Greenwich Park management hierarchy. And it shows. Greenwich Park is to be closed for a month in 2012 for the Olympic Equestrian Events. Wouldn&#8217;t it be wonderful if the rubbish dump were removed as part of the Olympic legacy to Greenwich Park?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/does-greenwich-park-have-the-oldest-avenue-of-trees-in-england/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Garden design and the history of art</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/garden-design-and-the-history-of-art/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/garden-design-and-the-history-of-art/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 07:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Garden Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garden history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic garden restoration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=7727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The top pictures show a medieval statue, Michaelangelo&#8217;s David and Bernini&#8217;s David. The lower pictures show a medieval garden, a renaissance garden and a baroque garden. The pairs represent the devotional attitude of the middle ages, the static calm of the renaissance the drama of the baroque. I think there are closer parallels between the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_7728" style="width: 785px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/styles_sculpture_garden_design-a.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-7728" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/styles_sculpture_garden_design-a.jpg" alt="" title="styles_sculpture_garden_design-a" width="775" height="777" class="size-full wp-image-7728" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/styles_sculpture_garden_design-a.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/styles_sculpture_garden_design-a-300x300.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/styles_sculpture_garden_design-a-150x150.jpg 150w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/styles_sculpture_garden_design-a-768x770.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/styles_sculpture_garden_design-a-624x626.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-7728" class="wp-caption-text">Developments in gardens parallel developments in the fine arts</p></div><br />
The top pictures show a medieval statue, Michaelangelo&#8217;s David and Bernini&#8217;s David.<br />
The lower pictures show a medieval garden, a renaissance garden and a baroque garden.<br />
The pairs represent the devotional attitude of the middle ages, the static calm of the renaissance the drama of the baroque.<br />
I think there are closer parallels between the histories of gardens and fine art than between the histories of gardens and dynasties, which makes me doubtful about the categorisation of British gardens as Tudor, Stuart, Georgian, Victorian, Edwardian etc.  Nor do I think kings and queens have had a leading role in the development of garden design. So why are royal names so popular in Britain? Are garden historians flunkies? And how do the Irish manage without royal names for garden styles?<div id="attachment_7732" style="width: 785px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/garden_design_history_flunky.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-7732" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/garden_design_history_flunky.jpg" alt="" title="garden_design_history_flunky" width="775" height="421" class="size-full wp-image-7732" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/garden_design_history_flunky.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/garden_design_history_flunky-300x163.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/garden_design_history_flunky-768x417.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/garden_design_history_flunky-624x339.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-7732" class="wp-caption-text">Are garden historians flunkies?</p></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/garden-design-and-the-history-of-art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edinburgh as an urban landscape design with some brilliant greenways</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/edinburgh-as-an-urban-landscape-design/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/edinburgh-as-an-urban-landscape-design/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Historic garden restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public parks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Design]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=7670</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Following upon the discussion of Copenhagen&#8217;s Greenfinger Plan, here are two photographs of my hometown. They show examples of &#8216;urban landscapes&#8217;. BUT BUT BUT I do not regard the buildings as &#8216;urban&#8217; bits and the green bits as &#8216;landscape&#8217;. I regard the scenic composition of buildings+landform+vegetation+paving+water (ie the Five Compositional Elements) as urban landscape compositions. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/edinburgh_urban_landscape.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/edinburgh_urban_landscape.jpg" alt="" title="edinburgh_urban_landscape" width="775" height="290" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7671" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/edinburgh_urban_landscape.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/edinburgh_urban_landscape-300x112.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/edinburgh_urban_landscape-768x287.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/edinburgh_urban_landscape-624x233.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/edinburgh_urban_landscape2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/edinburgh_urban_landscape2.jpg" alt="" title="edinburgh_urban_landscape2" width="775" height="328" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7672" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/edinburgh_urban_landscape2.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/edinburgh_urban_landscape2-300x127.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/edinburgh_urban_landscape2-768x325.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/edinburgh_urban_landscape2-624x264.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a>Following upon the discussion of <a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2011/10/13/did-they-make-a-mistake-with-copenhagens-green-finger-landscape-plan/">Copenhagen&#8217;s Greenfinger Plan</a>, here are two photographs of my hometown. They show examples of &#8216;urban landscapes&#8217;. BUT BUT BUT I do not regard the buildings as &#8216;urban&#8217; bits and the green bits as &#8216;landscape&#8217;. I regard the scenic composition of buildings+landform+vegetation+paving+water (ie the <a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/history_theory/garden_landscape_design_articles/design_methods/six_compositional_elements">Five Compositional Elements</a>) as urban landscape compositions. Another reason for calling these examples Urban Landscapes is that they are beautiful. The below photograph of part of what was once of the most important early baroque-influenced gardens in England (<a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/garden/sayes_court_garden">Sayes Court, in Deptford</a>) now lacks beauty and I would rather call it an &#8216;urban wasteland&#8217; than an &#8216;urban landscape&#8217;. Sayes Court was nearly the first place to be saved from demolition by the National Trust. Things didn&#8217;t quite work out! Should any elements of the historic design be restored when <a href="http://www.convoyswharf.com/">Convoy&#8217;s Wharf</a> is re-developed? The current design looks a bit Dubai-on-Thames but with duller architecture. The developers are Hutchinson Whampoa and the architects are <a href="http://www.bptw.co.uk/projects/planning/living/convoyswharf.html">bptw</a> working with <a href="http://www.aedas.com/">Aedas Architecture</a>.<a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/sayes-court-site_Daubeney_Tower.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/sayes-court-site_Daubeney_Tower.jpg" alt="" title="sayes-court-site_Daubeney_Tower" width="775" height="329" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7673" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/sayes-court-site_Daubeney_Tower.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/sayes-court-site_Daubeney_Tower-300x127.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/sayes-court-site_Daubeney_Tower-768x326.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/sayes-court-site_Daubeney_Tower-624x265.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/edinburgh-as-an-urban-landscape-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Claremont Amphitheatre as a problem in historic garden restoration</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/the-claremont-amphitheatre-as-a-problem-in-historic-garden-restoration/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/the-claremont-amphitheatre-as-a-problem-in-historic-garden-restoration/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 09:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Garden Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garden history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garden Visiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic garden restoration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=7493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Clockwise, the images of the Claremont Amphitheatre show (1) Charles Bridgeman&#8217;s design, as illustrated in Stephen Switzer&#8217;s Hydrostatiks (2) John Rocque&#8217;s drawing shows the garden as modified by William Kent after 1734 (3) a drawing by an unknown artist with the water as a circular pool (4) a recent photo of the amphitheatre as a [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_7494" style="width: 785px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/claremont_amphitheatre_evolution-a.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-7494" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/claremont_amphitheatre_evolution-a.jpg" alt="The amphitheatre in Claremont Landscape Garden" title="claremont_amphitheatre_evolution-a" width="775" height="553" class="size-full wp-image-7494" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/claremont_amphitheatre_evolution-a.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/claremont_amphitheatre_evolution-a-300x214.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/claremont_amphitheatre_evolution-a-768x548.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/claremont_amphitheatre_evolution-a-624x445.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-7494" class="wp-caption-text">The historic amphitheatre in Claremont Landscape Garden</p></div><br />
Clockwise, the images of the Claremont Amphitheatre show (1) Charles Bridgeman&#8217;s design, as illustrated in Stephen Switzer&#8217;s <em>Hydrostatiks </em>(2) John Rocque&#8217;s drawing shows the garden as modified by <a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/biography/william_kent">William Kent</a> after 1734 (3) a drawing by an unknown artist with the water as a circular pool (4) a recent photo of the amphitheatre as a feature in what is now called <a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/garden/claremont_landscape_garden">Claremont Landscape Garden</a>. Claremont is a pleasant and popular place &#8211; so why not leave it as it is? The amphitheatre was almost lost at one point and then restored by the National Trust. I am sure they were right to restore the amphitheatre but I do not think they went far enough. <a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/biography/stephen_switzer">Stephen Switzer</a> (in his<em> Introduction to a general system of hydrostaticks and hydraulicks</em> 1729) wrote that: &#8216;The upper part of the work may very easily be seen to be a sketch of the fine Amphitheatre at Claremont, (belonging to his Grace the Duke of Newcastle) the design of the very ingenious Mr. <a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/biography/charles_bridgeman">[Charles] Bridgeman</a>; and the lower part, where the water spouts out, is an addition of my own, from a work of that kind that I have done for the Right Honourable the Earl of Orrery , at Marson in Somersetshire. In this composition, which I humbly conceive to be the noblest of any in Europe, may be seen a very magnificent taste and way of thinking, and in which I can&#8217;t help observing, that had the ingenious designer had more room at Claremont, he would certainly have made his water much larger than that little circular basin, which is seen therein, and which is very much eclipsed by the prodgious grandeur of that Amphitheatre. And this I note for the advantage of those who have more room for such a purpose: as for the rest the plan speaks for itself.&#8217;<br />
Bridgeman and Switzer and  are significant figures in the history of garden design and far too little of their work survives. More of Kent&#8217;s work survives. The problem with Claremont is that it lacks the high quality one would expect from such a distinguished cast, though Vanbrugh&#8217;s avenue, bowling green and Belvedere Tower are very good. My suggestion is to restore more of the design shown on Switzer&#8217;s drawing.  I would like to see Switzer&#8217;s &#8216;water spouts&#8217; and the first metre of the baroque canal (it could be done with jetties if there is insufficient land). Restoration of the &#8216;wilderness&#8217; in which it is set would also be welcome (ie the woodland with straight rides and twisting paths).  This would give Claremont a clear separation between (1) the Kentian landscape garden (2) the late baroque features designed by <a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/biography/sir_john_vanbrugh">John Vanbrugh</a>, Switzer and Bridgeman. If some way of arranging it could be found, a way of viewing the house and setting which <a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/biography/lancelot_capability_brown">Lancelot Brown</a> designed for Lord Clive would also be highly desireable.  The aim should be to make Claremont into first class garden it should be: it is in danger of becoming a public park for the middle classes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/the-claremont-amphitheatre-as-a-problem-in-historic-garden-restoration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new-to-become ancient tree was planted in Greenwich Park in 2011</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/a-new-to-become-ancient-tree-was-planted-in-greenwich-park-in-2011/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/a-new-to-become-ancient-tree-was-planted-in-greenwich-park-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[garden history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenwich Park London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic garden restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban forestry]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=7601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There used to be a Horse Chestnut tree planted here. It died and was left as a 750mm stump for a few years, in which time it was much used by children and by those parents who liked to see their offspring acting as statues. When the heartwood began to rot they dug up the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_7600" style="width: 785px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/greenwich_park-ancient-chestnut-tree.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-7600" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/greenwich_park-ancient-chestnut-tree.jpg" alt="" title="greenwich_park-ancient-chestnut-tree" width="775" height="581" class="size-full wp-image-7600" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/greenwich_park-ancient-chestnut-tree.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/greenwich_park-ancient-chestnut-tree-300x225.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/greenwich_park-ancient-chestnut-tree-768x576.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/greenwich_park-ancient-chestnut-tree-624x468.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-7600" class="wp-caption-text">New ancient chestunt tree in Greenwich Park</p></div> There used to be a Horse Chestnut tree planted here. It died and was left as a 750mm stump for a few years, in which time it was much used by children and by those parents who liked to see their offspring acting as statues. When the heartwood began to rot they dug up the stump and planted a Sweet Chestnut last month. Yesterday they placed the circular seat around the tree. I see this as a clear indication that the park managers are <a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2011/09/30/love-and-care-for-the-ancient-trees-in-greenwich-park/">avid followers of this blog</a> and are hoping the new tree will have a long life. The tree against which it is seen has been there for 350 years. They hope to keep a full copy of the internet on Archive.org &#8211; so I hope someone will be able to find this blog post in 3011 and take a photograph of whatever is then growing on this spot. I would also like to know how long the seat will survive (<30 years, I guess) and how long the dog litter bin survives (>100 years, I guess). Dogs used to drop their litter everywhere when I first visited Greenwich (about 30 years ago). Then some good ladies and gentlemen held a Dog Day. One of them stood by each entrance to the park for a day and very politely handed out polythene bags and asked dog owners to collect any droppings from the dogs. The idea caught on and the Royal Parks commissioned these iron dog litter bins. It has been a great success and the park is almost free of dog dirt. As Roland Barthes observed, the droppings of wild animals are inoffensive but those of domesticated pets, and humans, are offensive. Interesting.<br />
<div id="attachment_7608" style="width: 410px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/roland-barthes-wild-domestic-binary-pair.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-7608" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/roland-barthes-wild-domestic-binary-pair.jpg" alt="" title="roland-barthes-wild-domestic-binary-pair" width="400" height="153" class="size-full wp-image-7608" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/roland-barthes-wild-domestic-binary-pair.jpg 400w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/roland-barthes-wild-domestic-binary-pair-300x115.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-7608" class="wp-caption-text">Roland Barthes' diagram deals with the wild:domestic binary pair and applies to trees as well as animals</p></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/a-new-to-become-ancient-tree-was-planted-in-greenwich-park-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A landscape memorial to Saddam Hussein&#039;s &#034;Victory&#034; over the Marsh Arabs who lived in the Garden of Eden</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/a-landscape-memorial-to-saddam-husseins-victory-of-the-marsh-arabs-who-lived-in-the-garden-of-eden/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/a-landscape-memorial-to-saddam-husseins-victory-of-the-marsh-arabs-who-lived-in-the-garden-of-eden/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 06:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asian gardens and landscapes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic garden restoration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=7567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Saddam Hussein&#8217;s Victory Arch in Baghdad is being restored &#8211; with mixed feelings among commentators. Meanwhile, the habitat of the Marsh Arabs is also being restored. But the Marshes, which are often identified as the geographical location of the Garden of Eden story, now have only a few thousand inhabitants instead of the half-million who [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/marsh-arabs-victory-arch.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/marsh-arabs-victory-arch.jpg" alt="" title="marsh arabs victory arch" width="775" height="581" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7568" srcset="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/marsh-arabs-victory-arch.jpg 775w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/marsh-arabs-victory-arch-300x225.jpg 300w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/marsh-arabs-victory-arch-768x576.jpg 768w, https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/marsh-arabs-victory-arch-624x468.jpg 624w" sizes="(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px" /></a><br />
Saddam Hussein&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victory_Arch">Victory Arch in Baghdad</a> is being restored &#8211; with mixed feelings among commentators. Meanwhile, the habitat of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_Arabs">Marsh Arabs </a>is also being restored. But the Marshes, which are often identified as the geographical location of the Garden of Eden story, now have only a few thousand inhabitants instead of the half-million who lived there before the wicked Saddam Hussein drained the marshes. My proposal is to make an area of marshland around the Victory Arch in Baghdad to symbolise the victory of the wetlands over the dictator. It could also create a tourist attraction, a wildlife resort, a water management facility and a recreation area for the oppressed people of Baghdad. The name of the city could mean Bag &#8220;god&#8221; + dād &#8220;given&#8221;, translating to &#8220;God-given&#8221; or &#8220;God&#8217;s gift&#8221;. Or it could mean  Bağ &#8220;garden&#8221; + dād &#8220;fair&#8221;, translating to &#8220;The fair Garden&#8221;.</p>
<p>Images courtesy  <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pennstatelive/5579639222/sizes/o/in/photostream/">pennstatelive </a> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/james_gordon_los_angeles/">james_gordon_los_angeles</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/a-landscape-memorial-to-saddam-husseins-victory-of-the-marsh-arabs-who-lived-in-the-garden-of-eden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.gardenvisit.com @ 2026-08-06 13:58:31 by W3 Total Cache
-->