<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Architecture in context	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/architecture-in-context/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/architecture-in-context/</link>
	<description>Gardenvisit.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:12:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Christine		</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/architecture-in-context/#comment-102</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=172#comment-102</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I look forward to seeing the new collages! Whatever Downing&#039;s faults may have been as a derivative &#039;romantic&#039; he bequeathed New York Central Park.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look forward to seeing the new collages! Whatever Downing&#8217;s faults may have been as a derivative &#8216;romantic&#8217; he bequeathed New York Central Park.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/architecture-in-context/#comment-101</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=172#comment-101</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Frankly, I&#039;m surprised Downing said anything so sensible! His architecture shows a strong interest in style combined with really bad taste.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I&#8217;m surprised Downing said anything so sensible! His architecture shows a strong interest in style combined with really bad taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christine		</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/architecture-in-context/#comment-100</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=172#comment-100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tom posted a reference to Andrew Jackson Downing&#039;s text &#039;A Treatise on the Theory and Practice of Landscape Gardening&#039;. Jackson refers to three principles which should be our guide in Landscape or Rural Architecture. They are;

(1) Fitness for the end in view.
(2) Expression of purpose.
(3) Expression of some particular architectural style.

Perhaps we might consider the Opera House collages in this context? Do you think these principles are still valid? Are they valid in geographical contexts other than North America?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom posted a reference to Andrew Jackson Downing&#8217;s text &#8216;A Treatise on the Theory and Practice of Landscape Gardening&#8217;. Jackson refers to three principles which should be our guide in Landscape or Rural Architecture. They are;</p>
<p>(1) Fitness for the end in view.<br />
(2) Expression of purpose.<br />
(3) Expression of some particular architectural style.</p>
<p>Perhaps we might consider the Opera House collages in this context? Do you think these principles are still valid? Are they valid in geographical contexts other than North America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/architecture-in-context/#comment-99</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=172#comment-99</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Adam has a good point and it would be worth re-doing the experiment with eg three different buildings in three different settings (eg waterside, countryside, town).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam has a good point and it would be worth re-doing the experiment with eg three different buildings in three different settings (eg waterside, countryside, town).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adam		</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/architecture-in-context/#comment-98</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=172#comment-98</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This would be a lot more informative if the big square of pale blue sky had been removed during the compositing. As it is, the Opera House will always look more natural on a horizon with that color sky.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be a lot more informative if the big square of pale blue sky had been removed during the compositing. As it is, the Opera House will always look more natural on a horizon with that color sky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/architecture-in-context/#comment-97</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 06:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=172#comment-97</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is something really scientific about montaging the same building into different settings. Good work! What is the building? Because the Sydney Opera House was designed as an iconic landmark it looks OK in the landmark settings but odd the ugly modern town.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something really scientific about montaging the same building into different settings. Good work! What is the building? Because the Sydney Opera House was designed as an iconic landmark it looks OK in the landmark settings but odd the ugly modern town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.gardenvisit.com @ 2026-05-26 22:19:15 by W3 Total Cache
-->