<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tunnelling for thermal comfort</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2010/01/13/tunnelling-for-thermal-comfort/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2010/01/13/tunnelling-for-thermal-comfort/</link>
	<description>News and debate from Gardenvisit.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:39:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2010/01/13/tunnelling-for-thermal-comfort/comment-page-1/#comment-3214</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=3532#comment-3214</guid>
		<description>Some suggest that spirituality should have a very broad meaning akin to &quot;a unique, personally meaningful experience (Shafranske &amp; Gorsuch, 1984)&quot; which as a definition gives a very broad church indeed. There is no idea in this definition of a spiritual experience being in anyway connected to spirit of any sort, the experience merely needs to be meaningful.

Under this definition a wombat undoubtably has spiritual experiences ie. the birth of young. 

But I don&#039;t think this definition is helpful when considering the sort of spiritual experience which is associated with religion in its various forms and hence temples and monasteries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some suggest that spirituality should have a very broad meaning akin to &#8220;a unique, personally meaningful experience (Shafranske &amp; Gorsuch, 1984)&#8221; which as a definition gives a very broad church indeed. There is no idea in this definition of a spiritual experience being in anyway connected to spirit of any sort, the experience merely needs to be meaningful.</p>
<p>Under this definition a wombat undoubtably has spiritual experiences ie. the birth of young. </p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t think this definition is helpful when considering the sort of spiritual experience which is associated with religion in its various forms and hence temples and monasteries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2010/01/13/tunnelling-for-thermal-comfort/comment-page-1/#comment-3201</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 06:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=3532#comment-3201</guid>
		<description>&#039;Spiritual&#039; is an interesting word, particularly when ued apart from religion. The Wiki entry notes that &#039;Traditionally, religions have regarded spirituality as an integral aspect of religious experience and have long claimed that secular (non-religious) people cannot experience &quot;true&quot; spirituality. Many do still equate spirituality with religion, but declining membership of organised religions and the growth of secularism in the western world has given rise to a broader view of spirituality.&#039; 
As a generalization, one could say that temple gardens dominate the garden history of East Eurasia and palaces dominte in West Eursia. But I would also say that a &#039;spiritual&#039; (ie non-material) motive has been of great significance in the west. And I would also say that a good many churches lack spirituality - thinking particularly of commercial pentecostal churches. This takes us to an important question: can wombats have a spiritual experience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Spiritual&#8217; is an interesting word, particularly when ued apart from religion. The Wiki entry notes that &#8216;Traditionally, religions have regarded spirituality as an integral aspect of religious experience and have long claimed that secular (non-religious) people cannot experience &#8220;true&#8221; spirituality. Many do still equate spirituality with religion, but declining membership of organised religions and the growth of secularism in the western world has given rise to a broader view of spirituality.&#8217;<br />
As a generalization, one could say that temple gardens dominate the garden history of East Eurasia and palaces dominte in West Eursia. But I would also say that a &#8216;spiritual&#8217; (ie non-material) motive has been of great significance in the west. And I would also say that a good many churches lack spirituality &#8211; thinking particularly of commercial pentecostal churches. This takes us to an important question: can wombats have a spiritual experience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2010/01/13/tunnelling-for-thermal-comfort/comment-page-1/#comment-3200</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=3532#comment-3200</guid>
		<description>This Serbian Church located in the opal mining area of Coober Pedy demonstrates something of the aesthetic potential of a spartian approach to underground dwelling inspired by a religious aesthetic. [ http://www.travelpod.com/travel-photo/flare/austrlia_2007/1189342020/img_0862.jpg/tpod.html ]

Although in this outback region of Australia...vegetated roofs are not really a possibility!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Serbian Church located in the opal mining area of Coober Pedy demonstrates something of the aesthetic potential of a spartian approach to underground dwelling inspired by a religious aesthetic. [ <a href="http://www.travelpod.com/travel-photo/flare/austrlia_2007/1189342020/img_0862.jpg/tpod.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.travelpod.com/travel-photo/flare/austrlia_2007/1189342020/img_0862.jpg/tpod.html</a> ]</p>
<p>Although in this outback region of Australia&#8230;vegetated roofs are not really a possibility!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2010/01/13/tunnelling-for-thermal-comfort/comment-page-1/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=3532#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>&#039;Aaaagh&#039; was the sound I made on glimpsing the photograph and &#039;cute&#039; is a great adjective for them. Its worth remembering that some of the first dwellings, in China and also in the Levantine Corridor (not to mention Alice Springs) were semi-subterranean. As you say and the wombats know, there are great advantages in living this way. &#039;From dust we came, and unto dust we must return.&#039; There must be a great future for earth sheltered dwellings (eg under vegetated roofs). And &#039;may we all be recompensed at the resurrection of the just&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Aaaagh&#8217; was the sound I made on glimpsing the photograph and &#8216;cute&#8217; is a great adjective for them. Its worth remembering that some of the first dwellings, in China and also in the Levantine Corridor (not to mention Alice Springs) were semi-subterranean. As you say and the wombats know, there are great advantages in living this way. &#8216;From dust we came, and unto dust we must return.&#8217; There must be a great future for earth sheltered dwellings (eg under vegetated roofs). And &#8216;may we all be recompensed at the resurrection of the just&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

