<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rescue garden archaeology before the Olympic equestrian event in Greenwich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2009/10/05/rescue-garden-archaeology-before-the-olympic-equestrian-event-in-greenwich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2009/10/05/rescue-garden-archaeology-before-the-olympic-equestrian-event-in-greenwich/</link>
	<description>News and debate from Gardenvisit.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:15:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2009/10/05/rescue-garden-archaeology-before-the-olympic-equestrian-event-in-greenwich/comment-page-1/#comment-2296</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=2788#comment-2296</guid>
		<description>The Landscape Institute has a very very cautious and very very slow procedure for developing what are called Position Statements. For fear of causing offense, they hardly every say anything about anything. I don&#039;t think I have ever seen a press report about the LI saying something of interest or relevance to debate on matters concerning the landscape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Landscape Institute has a very very cautious and very very slow procedure for developing what are called Position Statements. For fear of causing offense, they hardly every say anything about anything. I don&#8217;t think I have ever seen a press report about the LI saying something of interest or relevance to debate on matters concerning the landscape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marian</title>
		<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2009/10/05/rescue-garden-archaeology-before-the-olympic-equestrian-event-in-greenwich/comment-page-1/#comment-2295</link>
		<dc:creator>Marian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=2788#comment-2295</guid>
		<description>Fabulous photographs and how wonderful to have the original drawing.  Does the Landscape Institute involve itself in putting pressure on the right spots to get such work commissioned?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fabulous photographs and how wonderful to have the original drawing.  Does the Landscape Institute involve itself in putting pressure on the right spots to get such work commissioned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2009/10/05/rescue-garden-archaeology-before-the-olympic-equestrian-event-in-greenwich/comment-page-1/#comment-2258</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=2788#comment-2258</guid>
		<description>See Wiki on rescue archaeology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rescue_archaeology but the main points I have in mind are (1) do the work soon because if it is not done soon the evidence will fall to the bulldozer (2) do the job a less carefully than would be the case if the evidence was not threatened (3) fund the work from a non-traditional source (ie the developer). Olympic development teams always seem to be able lay their hands on limitless funds, unlike archaeologists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Wiki on rescue archaeology <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rescue_archaeology" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rescue_archaeology</a> but the main points I have in mind are (1) do the work soon because if it is not done soon the evidence will fall to the bulldozer (2) do the job a less carefully than would be the case if the evidence was not threatened (3) fund the work from a non-traditional source (ie the developer). Olympic development teams always seem to be able lay their hands on limitless funds, unlike archaeologists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2009/10/05/rescue-garden-archaeology-before-the-olympic-equestrian-event-in-greenwich/comment-page-1/#comment-2257</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=2788#comment-2257</guid>
		<description>Great photographs! And an interesting essay on skyline composition....

Are there any explicit expectations from the [rescue] archaeological investigation? And if so what are they? Or is the archaeological investigation purely exploratory? How does a rescue investigation differ from a general archaeological investigation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great photographs! And an interesting essay on skyline composition&#8230;.</p>
<p>Are there any explicit expectations from the [rescue] archaeological investigation? And if so what are they? Or is the archaeological investigation purely exploratory? How does a rescue investigation differ from a general archaeological investigation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

