Landscape and garden interpretation
Is this how we understand landscapes and gardens, natural and designed: through a friend’s camera reflected in our own glasses?
Image courtesy Mark Hodges.
Is this how we understand landscapes and gardens, natural and designed: through a friend’s camera reflected in our own glasses?
Image courtesy Mark Hodges.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Interesting question.
Comment by Christine — April 14, 2009 @ 2:46 am
This relates to your previous feed on Landscape as art or music. The need for interpretation begs the question as to the need for an audience too. I like Alan Weisman’s image ‘The World Without Us’ - suggesting that the at many levels the landscape has no need of audience or conductor.
Comment by Marian — April 15, 2009 @ 11:29 am
(1) I think it was Weisman I heard say on the radio that ‘all species become extinct’
(2) I drilled into a 700 million year old mudstone yesterday and, looking at the mud dust, thought that I was putting it back to how it used to be
(3) Think about 1 tree in a hectare of grassland. If it was planted by man it is completely different to a self-sown tree, even if they are physically idendical: so I believe the audience/conductor DOES matter
Comment by Tom Turner — April 15, 2009 @ 6:46 pm
Very interesting question.
Comment by Christine — April 21, 2009 @ 5:30 am