<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York New York so good they named it twice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2008/09/28/new-york-new-york-so-good-they-named-it-twice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2008/09/28/new-york-new-york-so-good-they-named-it-twice/</link>
	<description>News and debate from Gardenvisit.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:15:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2008/09/28/new-york-new-york-so-good-they-named-it-twice/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=299#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Would I be correct in assuming this would be your starting point?

&quot;When we speak of &#039;our street&#039;, &#039;our town&#039;, &#039;our country&#039;, and &#039;our Earth&#039; we are thinking of rights and duties which extend across property boundaries and transcend the generations. This requires Environmental Impact Design (EID), which may be defined as &#039;the adaptation of a project design with regard to the supply of public goods (social, natural and aesthetic) and the development of multi-objective landscapes&#039;.&quot; (Landscape Planning and Environmental Impact Design: Ch3 Context Sensitive Design Theory - Intoduction to EID)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would I be correct in assuming this would be your starting point?</p>
<p>&#8220;When we speak of &#8216;our street&#8217;, &#8216;our town&#8217;, &#8216;our country&#8217;, and &#8216;our Earth&#8217; we are thinking of rights and duties which extend across property boundaries and transcend the generations. This requires Environmental Impact Design (EID), which may be defined as &#8216;the adaptation of a project design with regard to the supply of public goods (social, natural and aesthetic) and the development of multi-objective landscapes&#8217;.&#8221; (Landscape Planning and Environmental Impact Design: Ch3 Context Sensitive Design Theory &#8211; Intoduction to EID)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2008/09/28/new-york-new-york-so-good-they-named-it-twice/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=299#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Thinking about the situation with landscape....It seems that unlike architecture, landscape is the &#039;thing&#039; itself. Art and architecture position themselves within the landscape in particular ways. But landscape as a made space? I would love to know how you begin to design with a &#039;landscape&#039; blank canvas? 

When I have designed with the landscape (and designed landscapes), the topography has always been one of the first points of reference...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking about the situation with landscape&#8230;.It seems that unlike architecture, landscape is the &#8216;thing&#8217; itself. Art and architecture position themselves within the landscape in particular ways. But landscape as a made space? I would love to know how you begin to design with a &#8216;landscape&#8217; blank canvas? </p>
<p>When I have designed with the landscape (and designed landscapes), the topography has always been one of the first points of reference&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2008/09/28/new-york-new-york-so-good-they-named-it-twice/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 06:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/?p=299#comment-181</guid>
		<description>I had to look several times and then do some Googling to work out that the photo is of New York&#039;s Hell Gate Bridge. It was designed by Sir Ralph Freeman in 1916 and lacks the majestic setting of Sydney Harbour Bridge. Note the name Sydney &#039;Harbour&#039; Bridge: it encapsulates the all-important relationship between the structure and its context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to look several times and then do some Googling to work out that the photo is of New York&#8217;s Hell Gate Bridge. It was designed by Sir Ralph Freeman in 1916 and lacks the majestic setting of Sydney Harbour Bridge. Note the name Sydney &#8216;Harbour&#8217; Bridge: it encapsulates the all-important relationship between the structure and its context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

